Sunday, July 31, 2011

Prom 20: Horrible Histories ? review

Royal Albert Hall, London

Pitched somewhere between a pantomime, a Footlights revue and an old-school variety show, this year's free Family Prom barely qualified for its Prom status, save for 10 judiciously chosen classical excerpts that were crowbarred in between the skits. Not that it mattered: the queue for returns snaked several hundred yards out of the Albert Hall, suggesting that this show could probably have filled Wembley Stadium.

Despite being aimed at children, Horrible Histories won a grown-up British Comedy award for best sketch show, testament to how its Pythonesque absurdism appeals as much to in-the-know parents as to their kids. A 5,000-strong crowd cheered as the Grim Reaper pranced around stage, brandishing a glittery scythe and making jokes about an obscure French composer's death. Thousands of screaming children corrected Henry VIII on his marital history and gleefully joined in Play Your Cards Right as they tried to guess how many people he'd had executed. And the feudal system was succinctly illustrated in a parody of the classic Cleese/Corbett/Barker sketch from The Frost Report, a routine even older than most of the parents here.

Rattus Rattus ? the Basil Brush-style talking rat who narrates the show ? described it as "a Royal Variety Performance performed by royals". It is not clear how much Richie Webb's songs (with enjoyably daft lyrics by the likes of Terry Deary and Dave Cohen) benefited from lavish orchestral arrangements: with Cleopatra's Lady Gaga-inspired theme, or Charles II's swaggering Eminem pastiche, the strings were unnecessary, even intrusive. The orchestral bombast made more sense when Georges I, II, III and IV formed a boyband to perform an ersatz Westlife number ("I was the sad one/ I was the bad one/ I was the mad one/ I was the fat one"), or when a Spinal Tap-style Viking quartet invaded the stage to lead a lighters-in-the-air power ballad.

A Horrible Histories theatre tour is doing the rounds, though be warned: it is based on Deary's mildly amusing original books, not the side-splitting TV series. This Prom suggests there would be more mileage in adapting the latter for an arena tour.

Tweet your reviews

The Guardian's team of critics will be reviewing every Prom this year and we'd love to hear your verdict, too. Every Prom will be broadcast live on Radio 3, or via the Proms website (you can also listen again for up to seven days after each concert). Send us your thoughts on the comments thread under each review, or tweet your reviews using hashtag #gdnproms. We'll collect the best together in a weekly blog on guardian.co.uk/music

Rating: 4/5


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2011/jul/31/prom-20-horrible-histories-review

Television Antigua & Barbuda Housing market International criminal justice Aberdeen Discrimination at work

Obama announces deal to end US debt crisis

Obama says a deal has been reached with Republican and Democratic Congressional leaders and urged members of Congress to get behind the proposed legislation

Barack Obama declared on Sunday he had reached agreement with Republican and Democratic Congressional leaders aimed at ending the US debt deadlock that has threatened to throw the US and world economy into chaos.

However, in an address from the White House, he added cautiously, "We are not done yet."

Although the Senate is almost certain to pass it, the vote in the House could be a nailbiter, facing opposition from both hardline Republicans and disenchanted, left-wing Democrats who feel Obama has conceded too much.

Obama urged members of Congress to get behind the proposed legislation, which will raise the country's debt ceiling and cut federal spending.

With time fast running out, Congress may have left it too late to meet the Tuesday deadline set by the Treasury for raising the debt ceiling above its current $14.3tn limit.

The US Treasury had said that if the ceiling was not lifted by 2 August, America would no longer have the cash needed to pay all its bills and faced the prospect of defaulting for the first time in its history.

Obama, after weeks of frustrating negotiation in Washington, said: "This process has been messy and taken too long."

The White House hinted yesterday that the deadline could be extended for a few days to allow Congress to get legislation through.

The Democratic leader in the Senate, Harry Reid, said he was "cautiously optimistic" a deal would be made, a view echoed by his Republican counterpart, Mitch McConnell.

The Senate could vote on the proposed legislation Monday.

The bill would then have to go to the House, where the vote could be tighter.

McConnell has scheduled a meeting with Republican senators for Monday morning to discuss the details of the deal. Speaking minutes before the president, he said: "I think I can say with a high degree of confidence that there is now a framework to review that will ensure significant cuts in Washington spending. And we can assure the American people tonight that the United States of America will not for the first time in our history default on its obligations."

The deal will raise the country's $14.3tn debt ceiling by about $2.4tn. It sparked an immediate backlash from the left of the Democratic party because it also includes about $2.5tn in spending cuts, much of it almost certain to come from welfare benefits.

The left-leaning grassroots organisation MoveOn described it as "grotesquely immoral".

The White House and congressional leaders were anxious to get some sort of compromise under way, fearful that uncertainty could lead to huge market falls today. The Nikkei rose after Obama's statement.

Experts warned that even if a deal was struck, the world's largest economy was likely to be stripped of its triple-A debt rating by Standard & Poor's.

The head of the world's largest bond investor ? Mohamed El-Erian of Pimco ? told US broadcaster ABC: "Things that need to happen are not happening fast enough. If S&P sticks to what it said, it will downgrade." Julian Jessop, chief international economist at Capital Economics, said: "It looks like they will get a deal done to lift the debt ceiling but it looks like none of the numbers are going to reassure the debt rating agencies. I'm pretty sure America will lose its triple-A rating."

Such a move is likely to prompt a big jump in the cost of borrowing for the US.

The Democratic leader in the House, Nancy Pelosi, praised Obama's for his role behind-the-scenes in securing the compromise but said that she had not seen the details yet. She was planning a meeting of House Democrats today to discuss the package and warned there should be nothing in it that hits benefits and working-class.

"We all may not be able to support it, or none us may be able to support it," Pelosi warned.

Raising the debt ceiling is normally routine but Republican members of Congress, especially a hard core allied to the Tea Party movement, have used it over the last month to hold the White House hostage.

David Plouffe, a White House adviser, told ABC yesterday it was not clear if there would be enough House Republicans to get a deal through.

The deal is mainly a victory for Republicans whose mission has been to cut the huge federal spending budget and undermine Barack Obama in his bid for re-election next year. The crisis has already hurt Obama, with a poll last week showing his approval ratings drop from 45% to 40%. But the Republicans may be hurt, too, by their association with the Tea Party.

The US's financial reputation has suffered as well, particularly over the last week, and even though a debt ceiling rise is now on the cards, the country could still see its credit rating being downgraded.

The deal also postpones a lot of the hard spending decisions by handing over negotiation to a bipartisan Congressional committe to decide. It is due to report by the end of November and will have to weigh cuts in military spending against cuts in benefits.

The deal emerged late on Saturday after fractious public exchanges earlier in the day between Republicans and Democrats. Pelosi, in a feisty speech on Saturday, accused the Republican speaker, John Boehner, of having gone over to the "dark side" in courting Republicans allied to the Tea Party. But after a series of negotiations involving Obama, Joe Biden, the vice-president, Reid, McConnell, Boehner and Pelosi, they reached an agreement on the broad principles of a deal.

The Senate, which remained in session over the weekend because of the crisis, voted on a mainly procedural issue yesterday to end a Republican filibuster on the subject. In what may be a last act of defiance on this issue, Republican senators mustered enough votes to block the Democratic move. Although that seemed ominous for bipartisan co-operation, Republican senators were on course to vote for the deal.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/aug/01/us-debt-crisis-deal-reached-obama

Stoke City Students CancĂșn climate change conference 2010 | COP16 Occupational pensions Nuclear weapons Savings rates

Tottenham manager Harry Redknapp dismayed by 'crazy' wages of players

? We cannot compete in an inflated market, Redknapp claims
? 'Transfer fees available but wage structure holding Spurs back'

Tottenham Hotspur are powerless to compete in a transfer market inflated by Manchester City and the other members of last season's top four, according to Harry Redknapp. The Spurs manager is eager to add to his squad and retain key players, notably Luka Modric, but he has been frustrated as other clubs invest heavily before Uefa's financial fair?play rules come into force from 2014.

Spurs have signed one senior player this summer ? the 40-year-old goalkeeper Brad Friedel on a free transfer ? and while funds have been made available for transfer fees, the club's strict wage structure has held them back. Their �22m bid for the Valencia winger Juan Mata on Friday may only bear fruit if Spurs remain sole bidders. Redknapp joked: "We were interested in Sergio Ag�ero but he wanted �250,000 a week in wages. We were only �220,000 short."

Redknapp's concern is that after missing out on Champions League football this season, the club's situation will only worsen as they struggle to match Chelsea's and City's cash resources, or Arsenal's and Manchester United's ability to generate funds through vastly bigger stadiums.

"You're looking to be a top?four team and it's difficult; we can't pay the wages that those clubs pay basically," the Spurs manager said. "The chairman [Daniel Levy] runs the club well, you get 36,000 people, you're not going to put the club in hot water.

"I think the wages have gone crazy. That is the problem. It's gone beyond all belief in the last little spell. We're well set up for financial fair play but it doesn't help when you look at what you're up against. It's like when you're a kid and they give you the most improved player of the year award ? you're useless."

Warding off interest in the club's leading players has also proved to be a challenge. Interest in Gareth Bale has been tentative but is expected to increase over the next year, but Modric's future has been hotly debated over the close season.

A throat infection kept the Croatia playmaker out of Spurs' 3-2 friendly win over Brighton & Hove Albion on Saturday, although Redknapp is optimistic that Modric will remain a Spurs player beyond 1 September.

"Obviously Chelsea have made it plain they wanted Luka but we want to keep him, and I'm sure we will," he said.

"I think we will bring one or two more players in, too. The chairman's trying, desperately. So we might get a bit stronger. But you know [Sir Alex] Ferguson has come out and said that there are five teams in [the title race]. What's he including? He didn't mention Tottenham, and probably with what Liverpool have brought in that's the way it will be."


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/jul/31/tottenham-harry-redknapp-luka-modric

James Beattie The X Factor Theatre Bolton Wanderers Radio 1 Paul Myners

Blackburn agree fee with Dundee United for David Goodwillie

? Dundee United's David Goodwillie set for �2m move
? Rangers also make fresh offer for striker

Dundee United's striker David Goodwillie is in talks with Blackburn Rovers after the two clubs agreed a fee, the Scottish club's manager Peter Houston has confirmed.

Rangers have also made a fresh offer for the 22-year-old after having earlier bids rejected, but they have not matched the package offered by Blackburn.

Goodwillie was left out the United squad to face Hearts in the Scottish Premier League on Sunday.

Houston told BBC Radio Scotland's Sportsound programme: "It's no secret Blackburn are interested in him. The clubs have agreed a fee. David Goodwillie is likely to go if he can agree terms."

The fee is reported to be �2m up front and another �800,000 of potential add-ons, with a sell-on clause included.

Houston added: "The chairman is happy with the offer Blackburn have made. I think Rangers have made an improved offer but he hasn't said to me whether he's happy with that or not.

"It's between the two clubs just now but certainly the only club that has spoken to David is Blackburn Rovers, and David's advisers haven't agreed a fee yet. I don't know what the Rangers offer is. I have heard it's very similar but only the add-ons from Blackburn are better, that's all I know."

Goodwillie scored 19 goals for United last season and made his Scotland debut in a friendly win over the Faroe Islands in November.

The striker's Scotland career was put on hold after he was charged with a serious sexual assault in January, but the charge was dropped last week because of insufficient evidence. That development sparked increased activity on the transfer front for Goodwillie, who has two years left on his Tannadice contract.

He now looks likely to move to Ewood Park unless Rangers can step up their attempts quickly.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/jul/31/blackburn-david-goodwillie-dundee-united

Stoke City Students CancĂșn climate change conference 2010 | COP16 Occupational pensions Nuclear weapons Savings rates

Radio review: Crossing Continents

This powerful account of North Koreans desperate to cross the border to the south was gobsmackingly good radio

Crossing Continents (Radio 4) is always good, but some editions are gobsmackingly so. Thursday's programme, on North Koreans who pay brokers to help them flee into the South, was one of those.

Lucy Williamson's powerful account was grippingly structured around the fate of a 12-year-old boy whose father was trying to bring him to South Korea to join him. He hasn't seen him since 2006. "August 14, exactly midday," the father recalled. The stakes are high in every sense. It costs thousands of pounds to arrange passage across the border, and those caught are imprisoned or executed back in the north. "Some people are so distraught they carry poison with them," we heard, preferring suicide to capture. Without overstatement, Williamson described any attempt as "one of the most dangerous in the world". A million soldiers and a million landmines line the border.

She also gained access to the secret centre in Seoul ? nobody would give her directions, not even the staff ? where newly defected North Koreans go for three months to adjust to their new lives. They learn to use buses, taxis, cashpoints and how to shop in markets. Back in North Korea, Williamson noted, food shortages are so severe that "people are eating grass". It was one of many shocking details in an outstanding report.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/tv-and-radio/2011/jul/28/radio-review-crossing-continents

Vladimir Putin Birmingham City Francesca Panetta Butterflies Everton Rihanna

At least Lord Coe is up to speed | Victoria Coren

Politicians are prone to dodging certainties. In a vague world, I'm grateful to hear one who isn't

Sebastian Coe does not like the idea of gymnasts going to raves. He doesn't want them getting E'd off their faces in fields. He doesn't want synchronised swimmers slipping off their nose clips to wang a line of charlie. He doesn't want to see archers on speed.

With all this concern, it sounds like the London Olympics are going to be quite the party.

Michael Stow, head of science and medicine at UK Anti-Doping (the agency responsible for drug testing in British sport) has suggested relaxing the rules on recreational drugs in time for 2012. Good news for the nightclubs of Hackney, if not the street cleaners.

Athletes currently receive an automatic two-year ban if they are found using prohibited stimulants. Mr Stow thinks this penalty is a little draconian when the stimulants are not always intended for cheating.

"More often," he says, "it's a case of them being used in a social setting." That's a charming use of language. A "social setting"? One pictures an array of athletes taking tea on the lawns of a stately home, their muscles rippling under lace gowns and boaters.

"May I offer you a cucumber sandwich?"

"Very kind. Might I pass you the crack pipe?"

"Thank you, I won't. But I wouldn't say no to a spot of LSD and perhaps another slice of that wonderful Dundee cake."

Michael Stow argues that "social" drugs should not necessarily result in the same ban as the cheating type. Retired Olympian Steve Cram says he might be right.

Enter Lord Coe.

"There is no ambiguity," he roared. "You want to be part of this project then don't take drugs. Full stop. There is no place for drugs. You can't mix the message up. It is the morality of the knacker's yard."

Thrilling! I love his certainty, I love his rhetoric; I love his strong, clear, emphatic statement of principle. There is something incredibly seductive, in these nervous, non-committal and focus-groupy times, about a person who knows his own mind and is not afraid to say so.

Most of us feel confused, indecisive and slightly fraudulent as we scurry around pretending to be grown-ups. Lost, flawed and desperate for guidance (or is that just me?), we're suckers for someone who appears to know what's what.

We love the crisp, Tannoyed voice of an airline pilot, the busy sternness of a hospital doctor, the ethical clarity of a vicar or the technical know-how of a visiting builder ? all of whom probably feel equally confused and fraudulent underneath, but God bless them for pretending otherwise. Someone in this mess has got to be mother. That's why, however strong the arguments for electoral reform, the British will never go for it because the one thing we don't want is an uncertain coalition. Lucky we haven't? oh.

Reading Michael Stow's arguments, I drifted in my usual fog of moral relativism (Sportsmen should be role models, shouldn't they? Or is that an unjust burden? Drugs ruin lives and bodies, don't they? Or is that hysterical? I'm allowed an opinion, aren't I? Or am I too drug-ignorant to be qualified? Should I wait until I stop waking up in the night in tears for everything I might be screwing up in my own life, holding on to heartfelt faith but doubting my own hopeful actions and inactions, staring my errors and fears and faults and massive life-gambles in the face, praying daily that this risky, bumpy and winding path leads home, before I start judging other people?) until Seb Coe's fearless absolutism burned through like a shaft of sunlight.

For Lord Coe, it's simple. Bend the rules for Olympic athletes? That way, he knows, lies the coke-snorting, drunk-driving, tart-shagging, spit-roasting, injunction-shopping lifestyle of the footballer. No dice. That's one problem solved. Hurray!

Then I turned the page and read that activists are putting posters up all over east London which say "Shariah Controlled Zone: no alcohol, no gambling, no music or concerts, no form of prostitution, no drugs or smoking". I assume these are not intended solely for the incoming athletes.

And I thought: no drugs, I like that. No smoking: bit harsh, I wish they'd just kept it to restaurants. No alcohol: wouldn't be a big problem for me, might feel a bit sorry for those who love a pint, I'd be delighted to compromise on "No drunkenness". No prostitution: unrealistic, better to legalise and tax it for the workers' protection. No gambling: that would be bearable as long as people understood the moral and practical differences between poker, sports betting and casino gaming, which they don't. No music or concerts: don't be so bloody stupid.

And I realised: 1) politically, we all know exactly what we believe, even we limp-liberal relativists who like to see all sides; we cheer strong opining only when it's the expression of what we secretly or unconsciously think already, stated more bravely than we'd dare ourselves.

2) Governments operate exactly like we do, their certainties a boringly predictable product of their environment and experience. Being increasingly made up of career politicians straight out of university, they are rather particular: they do drink, they don't smoke, they fear drugs, they like music, they're deeply conflicted about prostitutes and they don't know the first thing about gambling.

So, I tell myself and anyone with a similar weakness: beware the yearning for clear leadership, for as long as Parliament is so stubbornly homogeneous. It's comforting at home. But until a wider range of social types is in that house, be grateful for every vagueness, every uncertainty and every law they don't make.

Having said that, Sebastian Coe is still right. Obviously the drug rules for athletes should not be softened up. I mean, like, duh.

www.victoriacoren.com


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://feeds.guardian.co.uk/~r/theguardian/commentisfree/rss/~3/u3-PHs9Edtk/sebastian-coe-drugs-sport-olympics

Global climate talks Alliance & Leicester UK security and terrorism Rob Brydon Celebrity Sepp Blatter

Give the dog a room

The silly season is almost upon us, and so we bring you our first ? but hopefully not the last ? animal-related travel story of the summer: the launch of Chien Bleu, the UK's first luxury tour operator for travellers and their dogs.

The French name may give it a certain Gallic sophistication ? at least we assume that's the thinking ? but all 30 hotels road-tested by owner Erin Boyd and her trusty golden labrador, Blue, are actually in the UK.

Gems include the Pampering Pet Package at the Milestone Hotel in Kensington, west London, where the room service menu features steak and Cumberland sausage ? for the dog, that is ? and Blagdon Manor in Devon, whose "locally baked gourmet dog biscuits" are a highlight of any stay.

The PR couldn't resist slipping in a few doggy puns into the press release ? "pawfect" breaks, hotels have the "paw of approval" from Blue (Erin's dog ? keep up!), although there are disappointingly few puns on the website. It makes up for this oversight with a rather splendid selection of photos of Blue posing on an array of pristine cream sofas, armchairs and beds, as if to prove just how dog-friendly these hotels are.

We look forward to bringing you more on non-human travel over the coming weeks.

? Chien Bleu's website


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/travel/2011/jul/21/dog-friendly-hotels-chien-bleu

Television Antigua & Barbuda Housing market International criminal justice Aberdeen Discrimination at work

Rewind radio: Voices from the Old Bailey: Riots; British, More or Less; 5 Live Olympic countdown ? review

Amanda Vickery's stories from the Old Bailey made history come alive, while 5 Live was on top form for the Olympic countdown

Voices from the Old Bailey: Riots (R4) | iPlayer

British, More or Less (R4) | iPlayer

I am so happy that Amanda Vickery is a presenter. Every time I see her on TV, having a laugh with her interviewees, or using her iPad to make a point, I think: look, a normal person. A normal, clever person who tells us things we don't know, in a non-patronising, enthusiastic, useful way.

Vickery's specialist subject is ordinary British people in modern history, from the 17th century onwards. She made the excellent 30-part Radio 4 series, A History of Private Life, in 2009 (you can still get it on CD), and this week saw the return of Voices from the Old Bailey, which looks at Old Bailey court cases from the 18th century. This series reminds me, a little, of Jonathan Freedland's The Long View. Vickery, though a historian, is contemporarily minded, so keeps mentioning the present in her links ? at one point, on Wednesday's programme, about riots, she said: "Obviously they can't be on mobile phones to each other saying, We're moving on now to Fortnum and Mason's" ? and much of the programme is recorded on location.

The riots were put into context by other historians and, from time to time, actors read out real people's words, from Old Bailey transcripts. There's not many of these drama bits, which means the actors get rather fruity (not much to do, want to make an impression), when actually, just reading the words plainly would be interesting enough. But that's a niggle, really. I learnt a lot from this programme, including the fact that the Riot Act did actually have to be read to rioters by a magistrate in order to take effect. And that the Gordon Riots of 1780, which started as anti-Catholic persecution and ended as attacks on the establishment, were the largest episode of civil unrest in British history. Fifteen thousand troops were called into London to quell them, and 285 rioters were shot dead. Which rather puts today's mild insurrections into context.

Also on Wednesday, British, More Or Less looked at advances in DNA sequencing with reference to our nation's mongrel history. Soon we will be able to directly compare the differences between English, Scottish, Welsh and Irish people, see if we are all genetically different. Judging from the reactions of the Celts in the programme, many non-English people will be disappointed if we aren't.

BBC 5 Live made a big fuss about the Olympic countdown this week. One year to go, hooray! So 5 Live Breakfast came from the Olympic Park. Shelagh Fogarty was at the Aquatic Centre and Drive's Peter Allen and Aasmah Mir spoke to 2012 hopefuls from Trafalgar Square. All very jolly too, but it does beg the question: why is 5 Live moving to Salford in 2012?


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/tv-and-radio/2011/jul/31/voices-from-the-old-bailey-review

Gareth Barry Children Liberal-Conservative coalition Nepal Insects Tottenham Hotspur

Saturday, July 30, 2011

Bill Gates sells 5m shares in Microsoft

Software giant's founder has sold 90m shares in 12 months, but still has 500m; cash goes to help his foundation's charitable work

Bill Gates has sold another 5 million of his Microsoft shares, according to a regulatory filing.

Microsoft's multi-billionaire founder has been selling shares in recent months. He is the company's non-executive chairman, having stepped back from running the software firm in 2008 to concentrate on his charity work.

According to the filing, Gates sold 5m shares in Microsoft at an average $27.59 each on July 27. He has sold more than 90m Microsoft shares in the past 12 months.

Gates still has more than 500m shares in the company, but has decreased his shareholding over the last two years to fund his charitable endeavours and to diversify his portfolio.

This week the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation said it was making $42m available for eight universities to develop a toilet that does not need a sewer connection, water or electricity to operate. The ain is to improve people's health in parts of the world where there are few if any flushable toilets.

He is also backing research into improving education. "Every student needs a meaningful credential beyond high school," Gates said in a speech last week. "Higher education is crucial for jobs," he said, calling education an equaliser in society and the answer to getting urban America back to work and fighting poverty.

Forbes magazine estimates Gates's fortune at $56bn. Once the world's richest man, he is now second to Mexican telecoms mogul Carlos Slim after giving away a large chunk of his fortune to his charity.

Gates and long-time friend Warren Buffett have pledged to give away the majority of their fortunes to charity before their deaths, and have convinced a host of other billionaires, including Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg, to follow suit.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/jul/29/bill-gates-sells-5m-microsoft-shares-to-fund-foundation

Weekend breaks Lloyds Banking Group New Castle United Reality TV Banks and building societies Green politics

How can I ensure my siblings get their fair share of the family home?

My parents' home is partly in my name, but I want to make sure my siblings get equal share of the property when my mother dies

Q Twenty-seven years ago, when I was 13 or 14, my mother and father bought their council house. My elder siblings had left home by then and had bought their own homes and had their own families. My father and mother put the house in our (father, mother and myself) three names, although I was paying rent from the age of 16 until 30. At the time my siblings gave permission to put the house in my name.

However, I eventually bought my own house (aged 30ish) and lived in it for 11 years. I remortgaged it four years ago and bought another house in which I now live. I now rent my first home out but not for a profit, just making the repayment fees. I have now been told that I should pay tax on the rent, but I don't earn profit. I was happy making my mortgage payments and having a reliable tenant. In the meantime, the rented house has devalued and so has the home I live in.

Also, it has always been my intention to sell my rented house after the death of both my parents and buy my siblings out of their share of our parents' home. Legally they have no 'official share' but morally they have just has much right to it has me. My father has already died and my mother is 87 so I presume she will die in the next few years, but I don't know what to do. Should I sell my rented house now (although the price has dropped considerably) or should I wait until after my mother dies, when I could be liable for heavy tax implications because on paper I have three properties? My two houses are both valued at �60,000 leaving a drop of �30,000 each from when I bought them. My parents' house is worth roughly �100,000. CF

A First off, I think you should check the actual registered owners of your parents' house at the Land Registry. Although your parents may have wanted you to become a joint owner with them, this would not have been possible when you were a young teenager as children can not own property until they become adults at age 18.

Assuming that you are not legally a joint owner of your parents' house, the easiest way of making sure that you and your siblings all get a fair share of the property after your mother's death is to encourage her to make a will leaving the property to you and your siblings in equal shares. That way, they will have an official share and you can offer to buy them out after your mother's death.

Things could get a bit more complicated if it turns out that you do legally own a share of your parents' house. But a lot depends on whether you and your mother inherited your father's share of the property on his death or whether it all went to your mother. This should have been dealt with by a solicitor when your father died so it would be as well to check what the legal position is.

As far as the property you let goes, you should pay on any profit you make on the rent. If, however, you are not making a profit ? which you are not if the rent only covers the mortgage interest you pay ? than you don't have to worry about a tax bill.

When it comes to selling the property you rent out, there will be a tax bill only if you sell it for more than you paid for it. Also, your mother's death has no impact on the tax position of the let property and nor will the fact that you have three properties necessarily have heavy tax implications. When your mother dies, what will be taken into account for the purposes of inheritance tax is the value of what your mother owned and given that this seems to fall well within the nil-rate band for inheritance tax of �325,000 (in the 2011-12 tax year), there should be no tax to pay.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2011/jul/27/how-to-split-up-family-property

Credit crunch Reckitt Benckiser Beach holidays Virginia London Canada

America's other debt crisis | Ros Coward

Amid the war of words taking place in Congress, nothing is said of the environmental cost of overconsumption

One word is missing in the American debate over the debt crisis: austerity. It's a revealing absence. In spite of the vast deficit, and despite the US being the home of individualism, no way is being offered for individuals to make a difference by changing their lifestyles.

In the UK, we've become familiar with talk of the "new age of austerity". Politicians of both left and right use the expression to frame the narrative about the cuts we're now facing. While both sides "warn" about this coming era, austerity is not negative in the British psyche. Here, associations with wartime soften it. Austerity is associated with personal changes which benefited society and made sense to people who learned to tackle wastefulness, to "make do and mend". Long before the current cuts, austerity was making a comeback here, associated with the environmental issues of recycling, cutting consumption and reducing our carbon footprint. Indeed, the New Economics Foundation recently launched the New Home Front, arguing that wartime lifestyles are positive models for reducing our environmental impact. When we think growing our own veg, staycations rather than vacations, cycling rather than driving, it has a fashionable appeal.

Not so in the US. In the five months I spent there earlier this year, I never heard the word austerity in political discussion. The Republican discourse is all about how the government is spending too much. The government must tighten its belt. There was nothing about individuals living beyond their means and no suggestion that individuals have a role to play in the solution.

Yet the US deficit is founded on overconsumption, made possible by too much consumer credit and, less well recognised, too much environmental credit. In the current war of words in Congress, there are no references to the immoral lending that encouraged people who could not afford it to invest in the American dream. That's what led to the property crash and the financial crisis. That has disappeared totally from political argument.

From individuals I heard nothing about the need for prosperous people to change their ways. There are, of course, many worthy "green shoots", such as the "locavore" movement or the "greening the campus" initiative at the university I was visiting, where a newly appointed sustainability officer heroically tries to cut energy use. But people like him have their work cut out. The whole of the east coast and the rust belt are vast, shocking landscapes to which many Americans seem oblivious. This is a society which has lived not just beyond its economic means but beyond its environmental ones too as the hundreds of miles of abandoned buildings, abandoned cars, and endless highways bear witness to.

Yet the American dream survives. You're either in it, or out of it. Being out means destitution. Individual lifestyles are boom or bust. In the UK I know many people who reject consumerism, getting involved in poorly paid environmental or political work. We regard them as rather honourable. In the US, if you don't have money you don't count.

None of this is supposed to indicate we've got it right here. Far from it. David Cameron, the politician most often heard referencing austerity, has not linked it to a vision for a green economy. And the relaxation of planning controls with the potential to trash the environment would be a case in point. But at least words like thrift, simplicity and sustainability don't carry such negative connotations. They suggest we have, at least, a place to work from. In the US, the ideological mindset makes these negative terms, which in turn makes the future there look bleak. Their problem isn't just fixing government spending, but ultimately counting the real costs of the American way of life.

? This piece was commissioned as a result of our You tell us threads


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://feeds.guardian.co.uk/~r/theguardian/commentisfree/rss/~3/H9MDj5U-MIc/us-debt-crisis-environment

Tuition fees Boxing Wildlife Biffy Clyro Tottenham Hotspur Energy efficiency

Anders Behring Breivik and the logic of madness

The case of Anders Breivik in Norway reminds us that the relationship between madness and responsibility is complex

The announcement by his lawyers that the Oslo and Ut�ya killer Anders Breivik may be deemed insane has polarised once again society's preconceptions and prejudices around madness and the question of responsibility.

For some commentators, to be judged insane would exonerate him from responsibility for his actions, as if madness and responsibility were mutually exclusive. For others, madness would only exaggerate responsibility for the killings, as if insanity and violence were indissolubly linked.

The fact that media reports of "mental illness" so often associate it with violent crime means dramatic outbursts become almost what we expect. Perhaps, at some level, we not only expect but also desire it, as if to externalise the latent feelings of violence we all harbour within ourselves. The horror at the Norway massacre was, after all, tinged with fascination. Everyone wanted to know more, see more, hear more.

Breivik's case evokes that of Ernst Wagner, the German schoolmaster who strapped guns to his hands and opened fire on the inhabitants of the village of M�lhausen in September 1913. Demonised by the media, his case was used to intensify hostility towards the "mentally unwell". As Wagner's psychiatrist, Robert Gaupp, pointed out bravely at the time, recognising and explaining his patient's psychosis didn't mean that all psychotic subjects would act in the same way.

Wagner had in fact behaved as a good citizen for at least 20 years before the attack, yet his diaries showed that throughout this time he had been delusional. Like Breivik, the case demonstrated the compatibility of madness and normal life. For many years, Breivik led an uneventful existence ? studying, setting up a business, visiting the gym, going out for drinks with friends. He never came to psychiatric attention and there was no spectacular symptomatology, no bizarre behaviour.

Old psychiatry studied these discreet psychoses that fitted in well with society, often never disintegrating into breakdown or crisis. This was a quiet, contained madness, and it allows us to understand Breivik's actions far better than the plethora of diagnostic categories already bandied about by "experts". Paranoia has three classical components. The paranoiac has located a fault or malignancy in the world, he has named it, and has a message to deliver about it. For Breivik, the conviction is that Europe is rotten, that the name of this rottenness is Islam and that it is his mission to expose and excise it.

Whereas many schizophrenic subjects experience an invasion inside their body, the paranoiac situates it outside: there is some badness out there in the world. Where for the schizophrenic the other is often too close, intruding into their body; for the paranoiac, self and other are rigidly separated: the other is outside. And hence the paranoiac subject is always innocent: it's the other's fault.

Paranoia here should be differentiated from paranoid. Anyone can be paranoid, but paranoia as such implies a rigid system of beliefs with explanatory power, according the subject a fixed place in the world: for Breivik, that of the "perfect knight" battling Islam. The other common misunderstanding of paranoia is to assume it always involves persecution. In fact, many paranoiacs locate the malignancy not in a person but in some aspect of the world: a disease; environmental problems; danger to children.

They then spend their lives campaigning to remove this fault, whether it is by medical research, projects in education or environmental science. The most noble and charitable of pursuits thus often share something with the most tyrannical and murderous: to remove an evil presence from the world.

The paranoiac's delusion here can be false but it can equally be absolutely true. The FBI may not be plotting against you, but BP may be responsible for destroying nature on part of the American coast. The madness lies not in the content of the beliefs here but in the person's relation to the belief. If certainty about the belief replaces doubt, we are in the realm of psychosis.

This certainty will often spawn enthusiasm, forming groups or movements. Neurotic people are unsure of their aim in life, and sex, death and existence are open questions. Encountering someone who actually knows the answer to these questions will exert a gravitational effect. Breivik, like many others, will probably attract his followers.

This nuances the old-fashioned idea that the subject is only responsible for a crime if he "knew the difference between right and wrong", since the central feature of paranoia is precisely that the person does know the difference. That, indeed, is why they are psychotic: they harbour not doubt but utter conviction that what they are doing is the right thing.

? This piece was commissioned as result of our You tell us threads


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://feeds.guardian.co.uk/~r/theguardian/commentisfree/rss/~3/EG4zlWUy95g/anders-behring-breivik-norway-madness

Canary Islands Debit cards Pop and rock Annuities Alexander Litvinenko Liverpool

Horrible Histories

Video preview: The children's TV series Horrible Histories has teamed up with the Aurora Orchestra to perform some of the songs from the show



Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/video/2011/jul/29/horrible-histories-prom-video

Dance music Motherwell Newspapers Manchester City Buenos Aires Jonny Wilkinson

Why I'm calling a pensioners' strike | Brian Schofield

The country would grind to a halt if retirees did nothing for a day. We must show the coalition that pensions are about people

The coalition's war on pensions continues. The latest assault is on the provision for the retirement of public sector employees ? who are going to have to pay more to get (probably) less, and later. And not because their pensions funds are financially unsustainable (they're not) but because the pensions on offer just seem too decent, too respectful, in a country where such sentiments are now a luxury. No one else gets a well-managed, reliable employee pension scheme any more, so why should doctors or teachers?

And the war goes wider. There's talk of vicious cuts to the tax relief on private pensions contributions (vigorously denied, for now, but we shall see) and while the plans for the flat weekly state pension of �140 look enlightened, how long will we have to live before we get the first cheque? Sixty-six (the retirement age in 2020) is just the start of a relentless creep upwards. Frank Field MP, with his depressing willingness to think the unthinkable, has mooted a state retirement age, very soon, of 74.

Can the war be stopped? Not, surely, by the threatened public sector strikes. As a country, we've travelled so far from the idea that a secure retirement is a citizen's right, that no number of angry nurses on Whitehall will shift the argument. Only one group can remind us why we all chip in to pay each other's pensions. Retirees themselves.

I'm calling a pensioners' strike.

"Hang on, but pensioners don't work, do they?" And that's the nub of the problem. Because that pervasive attitude, that retirees don't "work" or "add value", and are a "burden" on the productive population ? that idea needs squashing, flat. In an act of solidarity with their juniors ? and a demand for a bit of bleedin' respect ? Britain's retirees should all, just for one day, do what everyone assumes they do ? sit around watching Cash in the Attic, maybe play a spot of golf, have a nap ? and do absolutely nothing else. And the country would grind to a standstill.

Let's have the strike in the school holidays, shall we? Because seniors are the largest childcare sector in the UK ? providing more hours of care than nurseries, nannies or playgroups, allowing hundreds of thousands of parents to go to work. The value of retirees' grand-childcare is estimated at �2.6bn a year. On pensioners' strike day, the economy would stall so heavily, George Osborne could use it as an excuse for his next growth figures. Then you have the 1.5 million people over the age of 60 in the UK who currently "work" as carers for ailing spouses, siblings and children. And these days, a significant proportion of retirees are actually still managing, sourcing or providing the care for their own parents.

Finally, a mere 4.9 million people over the age of 65 are currently regularly volunteering or participating in their local civic life. On strike day the country's museums, galleries, stately homes, community bus services, meals on wheels services, literacy programmes, adult education services and so much more would have to be shut down, denied the grey army that keeps them alive. As my grandmother perfectly puts it: "David Cameron goes on about the 'big society' because he doesn't know any old people. We've built it already."

Ironically, old age advocacy charities are desperately trying to promote increased public spending on pensions in developing countries, arguing that pensions are an investment in people at the heart of their families and communities, whose wellbeing thus promotes wider wellbeing. I recently met Lucy Wambui, a 70-year-old raising 10 grandchildren and three great-grandchildren in the slums of Nairobi, and funding all their education through her chip stall and the small pension the charity Help Age International was paying her. Was she a burden on society? Was she hell.

And that's how we should start viewing pensions ? not as an outlay, an entry in the national liabilities column, but as an investment in people who haven't stopped making a massive contribution to our lives. And maybe then, after the great grey strike of 2011, we can start a genuinely collaborative conversation about how the generations need to support and depend upon one another, in a humane and caring future.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://feeds.guardian.co.uk/~r/theguardian/commentisfree/rss/~3/uOfc3swLkmM/pensioners-strike-coalition-pensions

Vladimir Putin Birmingham City Francesca Panetta Butterflies Everton Rihanna

Unthinkable? Serviceable service stations | Editorial

Westmorland's independently owned farm shop on the M6 illustrates that there is scope to do things differently

The alleged worst of all the service stations has been refitted and renamed. Peter Kay once staged a cruel exploration of Britain's roadside culinary culture in the grim 60s eyesore off the M61 that was Bolton West. But its rebirth as the indisputably far smarter Rivington will not stir a song in the heart of many a traveller, despite ? or more truthfully because of ? the presence of big fast-food names like Subway and Burger King. There was a time when the dead hand of the civil service was blamed for the gory stodge served up in these concrete settings, since Whitehall retained a tight grip on the operations. But for many years now, commerce has been in control, and the results are evident in garish branding ? not transformed quality, and still less reasonable pricing. The long queue for a slurp of caffeinated sludge is no more bearable because it comes in a cup graded as "tall" or "venti". Food on the move needn't be this way: the street fare of India, to take one example, is traditionally both spicy and phenomenally cheap. Regulations and finances would admittedly preclude operating on Kolkata lines at Watford Gap, but Westmorland's independently owned farm shop on the M6 illustrates that there is scope to do things differently ? as does Heston Blumenthal's 2009 coup in taking a Little Chef into the Good Food Guide. Real choice, surely, ought to be feasible ? as should more realistic bills. Morrissey left his bag at Newport Pagnell; the rest of us might as well leave our wallets.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://feeds.guardian.co.uk/~r/theguardian/commentisfree/rss/~3/_1wYk-pv_sw/unthinkable-serviceable-service-stations

Private equity Nicolas Anelka Peter Beardsley Middle East Gareth Barry Children

Kumar is king of Nottingham swingers

Trent Bridge's reputation as a haven for swing bowlers was enhanced as Sreesanth, Praveen Kumar and Ishant Sharma merrily went about their business

Nottingham's reputation as a haven for swing bowlers was enhanced as Sreesanth, Praveen Kumar and Ishant Sharma merrily went about their business. Actually they were not that merry all of the time.

Kumar was distinctly grumpy when the umpire Marais Erasmus declined an lbw appeal against Kevin Pietersen. He was very keen to engage Erasmus in conversation at the end of that over and Harbhajan Singh acted as a peacemaker. It would have been a long and fruitless conversation since Kumar does not speak English fluently. However, alongside Sreesanth and Sharma, wisely shorn of the majority of his hair, Kumar made the ball talk.

This is what we have come to expect here. The ball keeps swinging; the pitch is hard and has sufficient carry for the edges to reach a busy slip cordon. It makes for beguiling cricket, in which a plucky half-century, such as the one thrashed by Stuart Broad, can change the course of the match.

And whom should we thank for that? Well, Huw Evans, of course. Evans of Maber Architects in Nottingham has been the guiding light in the rebuilding of Trent Bridge, making it the most enchanting Test ground in this country outside of St John's Wood. According to the locals it is the construction of the new stands that has made Trent Bridge an even more fecund hunting ground for swing bowlers.

The erection of the Radcliffe Road Stand in 1998 opposite the old pavilion changed the properties of a ground that used to be the Test batsman's friend. Denis Compton scored five Test centuries here; rather more recently so did Mike Atherton, four of which were struck before the Radcliffe Road Stand was completed ? and the fifth was against Zimbabwe in 2000. None of the specialist batsmen could get anywhere near 50 this time.

Since the opening of the Radcliffe Road Stand batsmen have turned up at Trent Bridge with the same trepidation as county players in the 80s, when Clive Rice, Richard Hadlee and Eddie Hemmings were in their pomp, but then the pitches were usually emerald green in the middle and dusty-dry at the ends.

If anything the addition of the Fox Stand and the evocatively named New Stand has increased the likelihood of swing. Precisely why remains a mystery to this column. It may be that the stands act as a windbreak, which produces the still conditions that encourages swing.

A lush outfield helps as well since this allows the ball to keep its shine; so does the sort of cloudy sky that hung over Nottingham on Tursday. And it may be that Mr Evans is a cunning scientist ? and a frustrated swing bowler.

Zaheer Khan would have enjoyed these conditions, but a rejigged pace attack offered a reminder that it was not an aberration to find India ranked as No1. They possess rather more resilience than they have been accorded since the heavy defeat at Lord's.

Until Broad and Graeme Swann opted for the long handle after tea the India bowlers displayed discipline and patience, qualities that have seldom been associated with Sreesanth. The last time he played at Trent Bridge in 2007 he completed a dodgy treble during a feisty match. He beamed Kevin Pietersen, he ran through the crease and bounced Paul Collingwood and he shoulder-barged Michael Vaughan. As a consequence he ended up out of pocket.

But this time Sreesanth was much more restrained ? although he did appear to celebrate a caught and bowled "catch" by hurling the ball to the heavens even though it was evident to the 14 other men on the field that the ball had not carried.

Apart from two attempted bouncers at Pietersen, Sreesanth had the good sense to bowl full at off stump and there was enough away swing for all the England batsmen to be troubled. The man with a new sensible haircut bowled very sensibly.

Kumar continued to delight. He must be the slowest opening bowler in Test cricket. He pottered in and delivered the ball at around 76mph; if he bent his back he occasionally broke 80mph. Here was the sort of bowler that Duncan Fletcher, who has always believed speed to be critical at the highest level, was wont to disdain. Ryan Sidebottom, a good 5mph faster, was not quick enough for Fletcher.

Yet Kumar, the wiliest of 24-year-olds, was never mastered, as the ball swung both ways from his subtle wrists. Strauss, whose footwork is conditioned to blunt bowlers of much greater pace, was leaden-footed on the drive. Eoin Morgan appears to be haunted by him. As at Lord's he was dispatched for a duck by Kumar and yet again seemed none too sure how he had been dismissed.

Sharma barely swung a ball. That is not his forte. But now that he could see where he was going ? he has had a severe haircut that keeps his mane out of his eyes ? he barely wasted a ball, in stark contrast to the first innings at Lord's. Within 69 overs England were dismissed.

But there is no knowing yet whether that is a good score at Trent Bridge.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2011/jul/29/praveen-kumar-swing-england-india

Tesco Local politics JLS Opera Recession Wolverhampton Wanderers

Friday, July 29, 2011

Ben Foster joins West Brom on loan as Boaz Myhill heads to Birmingham

? Blues and Baggies swap keepers for next season
? 'Ben is the goalkeeper we need,' says Roy Hodgson

West Bromwich Albion have signed the Birmingham City goalkeeper Ben Foster on loan for the 2011-12 season with Boaz Myhill going in the opposite direction. Foster's arrival follows the sale of Scott Carson to Bursaspor, with Birmingham taking Myhill to provide competition for Colin Doyle following the departures from St Andrew's of Foster and Maik Taylor.

Foster, who this year ruled himself out of England duty, will not return to Birmingham during the season as the deal prevents both clubs from recalling their keepers during the loan.

The West Brom manager, Roy Hodgson, said: "We are very, very happy that the deal to bring Ben from Birmingham has gone through. He was always the goalkeeper that we targeted as our No1 choice for the season.

"We are hoping he will be as successful here as he has been with his previous clubs. We are confident Ben is the goalkeeper we need to help us enjoy a successful season in the Premier League."

Foster joined Birmingham from Manchester United last summer and played all of the club's 38 Premier League games in a season which saw them suffer relegation but win the Carling Cup final.

Albion's sporting and technical director, Dan Ashworth, said: "We are absolutely delighted to have signed a goalkeeper of the calibre of Ben, who has just enjoyed an excellent season at Birmingham. He was our top goalkeeping target during this summer transfer window and it's great we have managed to bring him here. I have contacted several managers and coaches who have previously worked with Ben and they all spoke very highly of him, both as a professional and as a person."


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/jul/29/ben-foster-west-brom-boaz-myhill

Entertainment Asia Simon Barker Arsenal Blackburn Rovers West Ham United

Snooping around ? in pictures

From the waterfront to Winchester city centre



Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/gallery/2011/jul/30/snooping-around-homes-market

Celebrity Sepp Blatter Lake District Ethical and green living Lee Bowyer House prices