High court judge dismisses claim that union members should keep redundancy and early retirement benefits
The two largest civil service unions have lost their high court challenge to a scheme that will reduce benefits paid to members who are made redundant or take early retirement.
The Public and Commercial Services Union, which has 270,000 members, and the Prison Officers' Association, which has 35,000, called for a judicial review of a decision made in December 2010 by the civil service minister to amend the civil service compensation scheme, which applies to more than 600,000 workers.
At a hearing last month, lawyers told Mr Justice McCombe that, because rights to certain redundancy terms had accrued through length of service, they were classed as a "possession" in human rights law and should not be "interfered with" unless there was an overriding public interest.
But on Wednesday the judge, sitting in London, dismissed the claim and said the new scheme was valid.
He concluded that, while the benefits under the old scheme were possessions within the meaning of the European convention, and the changes did amount to interference, this was justified.
He said: "First, the interference must be in accordance with law which itself must be accessible, precise and foreseeable in application.
"Secondly, the interference must be in pursuit of a legitimate aim in the public interest and, thirdly, it must strike a fair balance between the persons affected and the community as a whole.
"The individuals affected must not be required to bear a disproportionate or excessive burden."
The only question was whether the minister had shown that the interference with scheme members' rights was a proportionate one within the limits of what could be afforded.
The judge said that he bore in mind that the scheme and payments made under it were designed to plug a gap between employments or between leaving the service and full retirement.
To this extent, they were "weaker" than pension rights which afforded financial protection for many years and into old age and had a transfer value, such as on divorce.
"Salary and pension benefits remain unaffected. The rights of scheme members have not been eliminated by the new scheme; they have been reduced in a manner designed to spread the burden fairly among all civil servants."
He said it was not contested that the new scheme, which was accepted by four unions, was still relatively favourable to departing employees when compared with statutory terms and the terms customarily on offer in the private sector and other public sector employments.
In his judgment, the reduction in benefits was "reasonable and commensurate" and the interference did not go beyond what was "reasonably necessary" to achieve the legitimate aim recognised on both sides ? reduction of the national budget deficit.
Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/aug/10/civil-service-benefits-overturned
Science fiction Waste US supreme court Equality Alastair Cook Kevin Campbell
No comments:
Post a Comment