The paper's readers complain about too much flesh on Strictly Come Dancing; they should see what's on the website
Kim Kardashian displaying a good deal in front or a great deal behind? Chelsee Healey showing off "her �3,000 boob job"? The tearaway Mail Online has them both, and much, much more from the flashing-flesh photo market (with two staffers in Hollywood simply to buy the best). But what's this from the Mail Not Online (otherwise the print version, where Paul Dacre still rules)?
After the campaign to push Rihanna's X Factor bump and grind beyond the watershed comes shock and disgust over "risqu� ensembles" on dear old Strictly Come Dancing.
Hundreds have complained about "plunging necklines", it seems. "Dangerously low-cut gowns" for the waltz would give Strauss a bad turn. "Jiggling flesh" is "not what I want to watch while I eat dinner with my son", says one aggrieved ? and oddly anonymous ? Femail.
Online Mail gives you cleavage for breakfast, lunch and supper. In newsprint, strictly prudes and custard.
Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/oct/09/daily-mail-online-paul-dacre-strictly-come-dancing
Francesca Panetta Butterflies Everton Rihanna Taxonomy Dimitar Berbatov
No comments:
Post a Comment